Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and The Testaments
I first read Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale about ten years ago and recently reread it, followed by the long-awaited sequel The Testaments. Atwood's dystopian classic, first published in 1985, depicts the Republic of Gilead, a totalitarian and patriarchal state created after the United States falls sometime in the twenty-first century. It is told through the eyes of Offred, a handmaid who is forced to bear children for Commander Waterford and his wife Serena Joy.
Because of the recent television series, which is a very faithful adaptation of the novel, 'The Handmaid's Tale' was fresher in my mind as a reread. I admire Atwood's ability to create detailed worlds in relatively sparse prose. Despite the fact that there isn't much description of Offred's surroundings or much explanation about the creation of Gilead at first, Atwood paints a vibrant and shocking portrait of this dystopian world, gradually building towards a dramatic conclusion.
XEM THÊM :
Kinh nghiệm chơi Tài xỉu online ✔️ Từ các bậc cao thủ
The Booker Prize was shared in 2019 by 'The Testaments' and 'Girl, Woman, Other' by Bernardine Evaristo. While the later seasons of the TV adaptation of 'The Handmaid's Tale' continue Offred's story, the book sequel wisely avoids comparisons with the TV adaptation by jumping ahead 15 years and introducing several new characters. Aunt Lydia, who trains women to be handmaids, is the only significant character who returns in 'The Testaments.'
She is one of three narrators along with Agnes, a young woman who lives in Gilead, and Daisy, who now lives in Canada and learns that she was born in Gilead. Aunt Lydia’s perspective is the most interesting of the three, as it adds so much more complexity to what we learned about her in the first book. Like the later seasons of the TV series, the horrors faced by the women no longer has the same shock factor, but ‘The Testaments’ broadens our understanding of Gilead and is just as pithy and pacy as ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’. The most effective dystopian fiction closely resembles real events, and the terrifying scenarios in both books have all been seen before in modern history.
Atwood's research for 'The Handmaid's Tale' included Ceauşescu's ban on contraception in Romania, while 'The Testaments' appears to have been inspired in part by the plight of refugees as well as the #MeToo movement. Both books, like George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, end with a metafictional transcript from an academic seminar of Gileadean studies near the end of the twenty-first century. The section in 'The Testaments' is especially significant because it sows a few seeds of doubt about some of the book's revelations, reminding the reader that the new characters' possible connections with Offred are never definitively confirmed, and that certain "facts" may not be all they appear to be.
Atwood's research for 'The Handmaid's Tale' included Ceauşescu's ban on contraception in Romania, while 'The Testaments' appears to have been inspired in part by the plight of refugees as well as the #MeToo movement. Both books, like George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, end with a metafictional transcript from an academic seminar of Gileadean studies near the end of the twenty-first century. The section in 'The Testaments' is especially significant because it sows a few seeds of doubt about some of the book's revelations, reminding the reader that the new characters' possible connections with Offred are never definitively confirmed, and that certain "facts" may not be all they appear to be.
READ ARTICLES:
Comments
Post a Comment